Forward to: Blatant Advertising I hate Microsoft Word. I want Microsoft Word to die. I hate Microsoft Word with a burning, fiery passion. I hate Microsoft Word the way Winston Smith hated Big Brother. Our reasons are, alarmingly, not dissimilar Popular definition essay writer sites sf it is a near-monopolist, dominating the word processing field.
Its pervasive near-monopoly status has brainwashed software developers to such an extent that few can imagine a popular definition essay writer sites sf processing tool that exists as anything other than as a shallow imitation of the Redmond Behemoth. But what exactly is wrong with it? These tools were fast, powerful, elegant, and extremely demanding of the user. Programs like WordStar led the way, until WordPerfect took the market in the early s by adding the ability to edit two or more files popular definition essay writer sites sf the same time in a split screen view.
An ongoing war broke out between two factions. One faction wanted to take the classic embedded-codes model, and update it to a graphical bitmapped display: you would select a section of text and mark it as "italic" or "bold" and the word processor would embed the control codes in the file and, when the time came to print the file, it would change the font glyphs being Berg cv writer site united kingdom Krampfadern to the printer at that point in the sequence.
But another group wanted to use a far more powerful model: hierarchical style sheets. Microsoft was a personal computer software company in the early s, mostly notable for their BASIC interpreter and MS-DOS operating system.
Steve Jobs approached Bill Gates to write applications for the new Macintosh system inand Bill agreed. One of his first jobs was to organize the first true WYSIWYG word processor for a personal computer -- Microsoft Word for Macintosh. Arguments raged internally: should it use control codes, or hierarchical style sheets?
In the end, the decree went out: Word should implement both formatting paradigms. Word was in fact broken by design, from the outset -- and it only got worse from there. Over the late s and early s Microsoft grew into a behemoth with a near-monopoly position in the world of software.
One of its tactics became known and feared throughout the industry: embrace and extend. Microsoft Word grew by acquiring new subsystems: mail merge, spelling checkers, grammar checkers, outline processing. But one by one, Microsoft moved into each sector and built one of the competitors into Word, thereby killing the competition and stifling innovation. Microsoft killed the outline processor on Windows; stalled development of the grammar checking tool, stifled spelling checkers.
There is an entire graveyard of once-hopeful new software ecosystems, and its popular definition essay writer sites sf is Microsoft Word. As the product grew, Microsoft deployed their embrace-and-extend tactic to force users to upgrade, locking them into Word, esl service uk blog editor changing the file format the program used on a regular basis.
Each new version of Word defaulted to writing a new format of file which could not be parsed by older copies of the program. If you had to exchange documents with anyone else, you popular definition essay writer sites sf try to get them to send and receive RTF — but for the most part casual business users never really got the hang of different file formats in the "Save As In the 21st century they tried to improve the picture by replacing it with an XML popular definition essay writer sites sf This planned obsolescence is of no significance to most businesses, for the average life of a business document is less than 6 months.
But some fields demand document retention. Law, medicine, and literature are all areas where the life expectancy of a file may be measured in decades, if not centuries. Nor is Microsoft Word easy to use. Its interface is convoluted, baroque, making the easy difficult and the difficult nearly impossible to achieve. It guarantees job security for the guru, not transparency for the zen adept who wishes to focus on the task in hand, not the tool with which the task is to be accomplished.
It imposes its own concept of how a document should be structured popular definition essay writer sites sf the writer, a structure best suited to business letters and reports the tasks for which it is used by the majority of its users.
Its proofing tools and change tracking mechanisms are baroque, buggy, and inadequate for true collaborative document preparation; its outlining and tagging facilities are piteously primitive compared to those required by a novelist or thesis author: and the procrustean dictates of its read more checker would merely be funny if the ploddingly sophomoric business writing style it mandates were not so widespread.
The reason I want Word to die is that until it does, it is unavoidable. I do not write novels using Microsoft Word. But somehow, the this web page publishers have popular definition essay writer sites sf browbeaten into believing that Word is the sine qua non of document production systems.
They have warped and corrupted their production workflow into using Microsoft Word. It is, quite simply, unavoidable. And worse, by its very prominence, we become blind to the possibility that our tools for document creation click be improved.
It has held us back for nearly 25 years already; I hope we will find something better to take its place soon. Ah well, I still remember the days when single-character screwups in the WordPerfect code could corrupt a whole document, or when translating from PC Word to some old Mac format and back popular definition essay writer sites sf lead to corrupted email attachments that would fill up all spare memory on my hard drive as they tried to download.
Just imagine calling a service now and telling them to delete the email from the queue. Or the mutating horror popular definition essay writer sites sf was three people commenting on one document, about fifteen years ago.
Now I just worry about taking more than four hours to format aword document for a print on demand service. Not to mention the danger of summoning up a Being of Utter Darkness by inadvertently running a Microsoft Word Macro that someone embedded in your Normal Template.
I warned my Science Ed Lecturer about it. And did she listen? And even the gurus with job security hate it. So then, inevitably, I finally convince my managers popular definition essay writer sites sf switch to something like InDesign which was http://piernassexy.co/professional-book-review-editor-sites-for-masters.php appropriate to what they study cheap ghostwriters case canada website to do in the first place Companies these days will outsource infrastructure to the cloud or jobs to countries that pay lower wages if it will save a few bucks.
Word is even "hampered" by the fact that you have to pay a lot of money for it whereas the competition gives itself away for free. Is it really that Microsoft has managed to pull of some insanely elaborate conspiracy to force everyone to use their product? Or is it that they spend billions of dollars each year studying how popular definition essay writer sites sf use their products in an attempt to stay far enough ahead of the competing products that companies that will do anything to save a buck rede, cheap thesis statement writers services for college Krampfadern assessments on how their people use the product and find that the cost of moving to an alternative, even if it is free, exceeds the cost of updating to the newest version of Office?
But I agree completely with Charlie. At one time I had to be a Word guru for my wife, who wrote several novels and a slew of short stories on an original model IBM PC with it. One of my tasks was keeping a small set of styles working as Word versions played Click at this page with the rules. Hey, I love Microsoft Word! By which I mean Word 5. For my books I need to use Unicode, so at some point I sigh and copy everything into a more modern Word, which is slow, bloated, and regularly crashes.
I agree with the post, and with the comments about trying to get people to use the style tools. The added problem I have is that in my field of Requirements Management, most of the software tools available make a big deal about being integrated with Office.
This means you can take your contract, design documents and so on, import them, and link requirements to each other. Except, of course, you have to have the documents formatted just so, and then they are being changed all the time, and it just adds a layer of import and export popular definition essay writer sites sf cleaning up and effort, for little return.
I work at a research institute where all peer-reviewed articles are produced in LaTeX, by people using vi. I, however, produce annual reports, budget requests, research proposals etc. Also, BBEdit makes it easy to check for spurious line breaks and other nasties.
I always tell colleagues not to bother doing any formatting in Word since I throw it all away anyway. LaTeX files which some send with math formulas embedded are deTeXed and checked in BBEdit before placing.
Then the math is typeset again Such is the joy of producing print from different sources. No headlines, no figures, as basic and unadorned as possible. This had the advantage that they could use anything they liked to generate it.
This had the added advantage that the reviewer concentrated popular definition essay writer sites sf the content, not the pretties. Finally the review comments were incorporated, by hand, into the final doc bloody versioning causes more problems than it solves - metadata tided up, and the doc issued usually via a PDF. More than once we had docs with embedded active essay writer website canada and other secret data that had once been there, but deleted - when they had gone formatting first.
I agree completely: Word 5. Anyone remember the i4i lawsuit about custom XML which they built into Word ? Nobody forced people to switch over to Word. It started as a vogue and then became a ubiquitous practice. The buyers of WordPerfect, Corel, are probably the most notorious in that regard. Adobe is not far away, either. Furthermore, the programs they all bought mostly ended on the scrapheap while the buyer came out with their own version of what the purchased program could do.
Twhirl, a Twitter client, was one of the latest victims in this process. Which then leads to yet another point: the main problem with Word is that it tries to be everything to everybody. The in famous "all and the kitchen sink" approach.
So in Word we got a text processor, we got a mail merger, we got an equation editor, we got a page layout editor, we even got a rudimentary image editor. The result is a vast complexity of the program and numerous bugs.
The number of difficulties is greatly reduced if you use Word just for text processing. Their attempt to switch to a subscription model fizzled. Adobe, on the other hand, seems to have managed okay, money-wise. Popular definition essay writer sites sf all said, yes, I agree with you about problems in Word. Their spelling and grammar checkers are targeted towards the brain-dead bureaucratese and business-ese. Their styles are an abomination. Still, for plain writing it works just good enough.
Never wrote anything longer than words in it, though, so I might be completely unaware of problems with longer texts. Totally agree that it sucks to use 1. Word of the nineties in this age where publishing is supposed to be instant and 2. On the second thought, it seems to me that Word and Word had the same format, but the format certainly changed into.
You think the file format is "deliberately obfuscated" based on that? Unfortunately I had to install the Spawn of Redmond last year, because publishers now expect writers to work in Word. Because everyone uses Word, so they have to as well. Being been finally forced kicking and screaming into dealing with edits coming back from the publisher in Word, I finally see why all the love for Scrivener from other writers.
My reaction to "but you must try Scrivener! It popular definition essay writer sites sf you to do XYZ! Trying to kill it just makes it stronger, for reasons which are too complicated to describe, but which are rather popular definition essay writer sites sf in structure to immune system failures. On the other hand, this is becoming less and less of an issue. You popular definition essay writer sites sf just buy a phone or other popular definition essay writer sites sf to run word and ignore it except when someone needs to deal with it.
You might also want to make sure that you add a small fee to your interactions with such people, to pay for your extra overhead and loss of sanity. The same argument goes for pretty much the rest of the Microsoft Monoculture, the deficiencies of which have severely cramped peoples popular definition essay writer sites sf to think clearly about abstract computing concepts.
One popular definition essay writer sites sf the worst consequences is that far too many people today think security is something that magically happens when you install a virus-scanning package. Various kind people on twitter sent me possible cheats to get round this, but none of them worked.
I remember well the WordPerfect days and just like there was life before Word, there will be life after it just hope we can read all those documents in 20 years time.
I have no problem with people choosing to pay and use Word, but they must not impose it on me. I think we need a more decisive move to open document standards like ODF. Many governments recognise the need for it, and pay lip service through declaring it as their standard, and then they continue to work in docx format! Or trying and failing to work out how many levels of bulleted indent you wanted. Charlie — errr …. I remember Word Pervert — euuuw. No, vi is shite.
So, we need to start again. And in what direction s do we need to go? Chrome is better than IE? WHich makes for hideous viewing. These idiots have obviously never come across Tufte To me, critical essay writing website online hate talk around Word is similar to the hate talk around Perl.
You have a tool, which grew from simple and understandable by any user to one encompassing all possible uses, a Gatling gun on tracks shooting Swiss army chainsaws, and then you complain that people are using it wrong.
Because there are 10 ways to achieve the same superficially similar results, and the right one is not the most obvious. Most people expressing hate do not seem popular definition essay writer sites sf know, but you can write consistent, well-formatted Word document e.
PhD thesis or manuscript, I do not have experience of writing actual books with figure, equation and table tracking using 4 or 5 styles — and you will get a nicely formatted table of contents as a bonus.
Popular definition essay writer sites sf will be the only person in the lab working this way, OK. I would possibly prefer to write my scientific work in LaTeX — but to use LaTeX for chemistry means having balls of steel, because you get most of problems without most of the benefits.
LaTeX chemistry community is notoriously small, and it was NOT created with this task in mind. Even less will they want to connect to your Subversion repo to do collaborative editing. Generally, in my opinion, until the time of weak AIs as popular definition essay writer sites sf secretaries comes, anything killing Word will become a Word itself. It is inconsistent crazy and bloated, in other words because documents reflect many different types of work - and all people doing check this out work have to somehow exchange the editable results.
Popular definition essay writer sites sf do not see any ways to avoid this internal problem. My biggest problem is with the ribbon interface. The average formatting task now takes two or three extra mouse clicks, provided that you can even find the command you want to use.
Worse, judging by the GUI, Microsoft appears to consider their target audience to be eight-year-olds who need to adorn their homework with pastel-coloured headings, drop shadows around embedded images, and glowing outlines around particular popular definition essay writer sites sf. Want to display two pages on the screen at the same time so that the left page is on the left and the right page is on the right?
Style formatting is a nightmare. The default setting is to add any modified styles that exist in each document you open to your own normal template, without asking for confirmation that you wish to do so. That has wreaked havoc in at least one organisation that I worked with, where uncontrolled variations on "heading 1" and its ilk had propagated around the business like a virus.
Style inheritance across section breaks is borked to the point where extra, entirely blank pages will popular definition essay writer sites sf in a printed document even though print preview refuses to accept their existence.
Yet some kernel of code must recognise that they exist, because it throws out all your page numbers accordingly. I had never felt contempt for a piece of software before I started using Word And this is why things will not improve: corporate use of Office is so endemic that the user experience is entirely irrelevant. The Scrivener folks are doing an evaluation offer for Nanowrimo that lets you install a trial version which is good until the second week of December.
Greg 28 - Have you tried Stylebot or Stylish - both Chrome extensions that let you popular definition essay writer sites sf with CSS In personal writing, I use both Word for running text and Storyist similar principle popular definition essay writer sites sf Scrivener, but a better fit for me.
A parser is built into Cocoa, which means writing applications that will read and write. I mostly work in. Until the point where. Then I learnt more about programming and got wiser. This improves access, particularly in popular definition essay writer sites sf large documents. Viewed from that direction, shifting users over to. So while I dislike this particular implementation the Mac version at least can be tamed in that you can turn off the ribbon and get your own pallets and dislike the bloatware aspect, I would like to keep the general text processor model, because, on the whole, it suits me.
Word is awful when it comes to working with equations and most journals outright ban the latest. And it feels just hacky to use. Held popular definition essay writer sites sf by the enticing embrace of WYSIWIG and the requirements of my superiors, but feeling hollow after the loss of easy and beautiful equations, within document referencing, excellent external references, and a vim-like interface. Plus the dirty feeling I get when I use non-free software OS X is good enough that I can overlook it, Word is certainly not.
But even after 11 odd years, no journal I use will touch it. As a very minor contributor to the project I must say that it is currently a very good citation manager. However it has recently been bought by Elsevier evil! Its best use seems to be for storing and sharing papers. I do some editing somewhere between top cover letter writers for hire and copy-editing for a scientific journal in a field where LaTeX is the default.
I did once write some proceedings papers in Word, and once a grant proposal, back around the turn of the century. Zotero has an implentation of reference which can be ported with some limitations between LibreOffice and Word. But beware: two behemoths have many other incompatible features. In any case, all comes down to people using tools, not the tools themselves. After I allowed him to install Arch Linux on his work PC windows port of emacs somehow popular definition essay writer sites sf not sufficehis speed of writing, measured unfortunately in lines per week rather than pages per popular definition essay writer sites sf, did not observably improve.
And do popular homework writers for hire uk even remind me the horror of him drawing his conference poster in Scribus - an open-source analog of InDesign unable to create tables So, what kind of a business case would convince your industry to improve its tooling, and what kind of investment would this require? In my second technical writing job, inthe department I joined had just recently been instructed they were to change all of their manuals into Microsoft Word to make it easier for other departments in the company to be able to read them.
Microsoft Word did not have the capacity to handle a document that big. If we had to seinem cheap argumentative essay editor site for mba machte MS Word to do the manuals, we would have to break the manuals down into smaller chunks, we could not have a single file for a single system.
The department went through about three years of hell before I left, attempting somehow to fit a quart into a pint pot before finally getting senior management authorisation to use something other than Word.
The company went bust a couple of years after I left. Although I rarely use it, Mou gives me a TeX editor for maths formulae too. You can already basically set out a webpage to the nearest pixel if you really want to, DTP like. And at least the us critical services essay analysis writers is actually accessible.
Heck, embed the CSS in the head and one file The big problem with Word is that its markup is horribly non-orthogonal and in general not nestable. If you have a multi-paragraph item in a list, that means the next list item is effectively starting a new list, with popular definition essay writer sites sf numbering starting where the previous one left off. And all the alternative word processing programs have to be able to round-trip Popular definition essay writer sites sf documents so they religiously copy the format.
Which means that even if Word dies, its appalling design will never be discarded. I hope that not just Word but all the fixed-page-size formats popular definition essay writer sites sf out soon.
Hello, I fully agree with your description of Word, but I am surprised by your point about publishers. Many publishers know that word is very bad for publishing. I know that for scientific publications, latex is the rule a friend of mine click at this page popular definition essay writer sites sf lot of mathematic translations.
I have heard also about pdf. Word is a decently good product for the office, but not adapted at all for publishing. I feel your complaints should be addressed to your publishers. Right now they benefit from a virtuous vicious? Schools especially are drawn to it because they can get it as part of a package with email services and collaboration tools that they can give to students at low cost to themselves.
Not that Google docs is that great from a publishing stand point, but for the average home user it is fine and could lead people to stop buying Word and thus break source cycle. However, in my experience home users typically stick with one version of Office for years, and install http://piernassexy.co/top-business-plan-ghostwriters-services.php on all their computers whether they are allowed to or not.
They may not like the idea of a monthly fee. I still have Office because I got it cheap with an academic discount and both OpenOffice and Google Docs had been having formatting issues when I was exchanging documents with my professors using Word.
But in the end it may come down to what businesses do. My workplace is doing a trial of Office I agreee entirely with this sentiment. Nowadays, any time I want to write any kind of document, I do so in Markdown.
I used to be a customer service grunt for a big UK insurer, and I saw Excel used in the most unspeakable ways. A lot of mission-critical data that really belonged in a relational database was stored in Excel spreadsheets, and frequently got overwritten if two or more people accessed it simultaneously of course, you could limit access to a single person at a time, but then that person invariably left it open when they went to lunch so nobody could get their work done.
The only way of rolling back any changes that went wrong was by check this out the IT department to get a previous version of the file. A staggering amount of vital tasks were done with VBA macros that were an unbelievable pain to use and required a great deal of manual work by the user before they were run.
Write your documents in PostScript, like Don Lancaster Mr. I work for an eDiscovery firm. However, we have a competitive edge on our direct competitors in large part because we use the MS Office suite itself to render documents to the image formats so beloved by the legal industry TIFF and PDF for the most part.
That has its own problems too. I never knew that. I copied a list of names from Word into a blog post a while back, not wanting anything but the plain popular masters essay proofreading websites gb. Half an hour later I gave up trying to get the HTML popular definition essay writer sites sf look right, opened a Terminal window and copied the popular definition essay writer sites sf of names from Word into vi, then copied it from vi to the blog post - success.
It also explains the slightly baffled "works for me" comments you hear occasionally - if click at this page only ever use styles, and if you have a popular definition essay writer sites sf policy on the use of styles, and if everyone sticks to it, presumably there genuinely would be no popular definition essay writer sites sf. If you standardise rigidly on anything and ignore the complaints you can make it work.
Http://piernassexy.co/custom-academic-essay-proofreading-service-ca.php I used to talk to IBM users all the time. My own use of styles consists of. Not a comment, just a war story. I edited a Windows magazine for a while, after persuading my boss that his candidate for editor would be better suited to the Technical Editor post.
Popular definition essay writer sites sf, bit quirky, bit individual, leave it in". The second question and answer were also given as a pair of paragraphs beginning "Q" and "R"; the third question and answer, however, came as a pair of paragraphs beginning "S" and "T".
At this point I saw read more was going on, and changed the "R" prefix to an "A".
Word changed it backright before my eyes. Thinking about it now, it was the combination of defaults, importation of styles, auto-formatting and inheritance from the previous paragraph that did for me. Combined with some other bugs and "features" like pasting formatting all the bloody timemeans that often the styles of parts of documents are inconsistent, and impossible to make consistent without copying them to a text editor, and then back again.
The styles system of word processors is probably my biggest complaint with them, especially as I use HTML and CSS, and can reasonably expect things to scholarship popular websites essay ghostwriters au work unless I explicitly muck around. And then we have people: Nobody knows how to use styles, instead they use bold and size So they make something a heading, and then unbold it or whatever.
And nobody is canada writer solving for hire cheap problem taught to leave the formatting until last i. And all this makes it impossible to use a word processing tool as an effective collaboration tool for anything complex. There are some bugs article source LibreOffice that I can trigger all on my own which I should report: e.
I also note that many of my complaints have been click at this page by other commentators.
My last job involved monthly reporting to the click the following article agency. The main contractor was a one-man company, and he was picky about formatting consistency. Once he showed me how he wanted something formatted, and it involved about six incredibly counterintuitive steps.
Chris Harris 31 mentions a point which just may bring about some real change in this area: recent Microsoft products are increasingly, obsessively, targeting light-weight, amateur users.
This is perhaps the most baffling thing about the re-designed UI and "appification" of Windows 8: it seems to be a complete abandonment of the office productivity market. By hiding away the task-switching ability of the task bar Windows 7 is a really nice working environment for switching around between multiple applications and cutting back on the customisation with features like the ribbon, it seems like Microsoft is leaving a gap for high-end users.
They suffer from terrible extensibility, and tend to be loosely defined with a large number of reserved characters and awkward or non-existent escaping mechanisms. That poster child of wikis, Wikipedia, now considers the markup that grew organically in its early versions to be an albatross that scares away new users. AFAIK, the only way to take a document out of Google Docs is to export it to some other format, with no guarantee of round-trip conservation of formatting.
Rather than offering something new, they exist for largely philosophical reasons: to do exactly what Word does, but with a different moral compass. It was designed to better expose the enormous functionality of Office to users who did not yet memorize the impossibly-large menu structure. Microsoft increasingly had requests for new features that were already popular definition essay writer sites sf Office, just difficult to find.
In my general experience observing users, novice users are confused about everything but more quickly adapt since searching for features is somewhat easier. Power users get the quick-access-bar to make their popular definition essay writer sites sf giant memorized custom toolbars of old, and at any rate are expected to be able to adapt to change. I deal with pharmaceutical research docs, whose lifetimes span years, multiple editors and thus multiple versions of Word.
If you want to see something really scary, look at the XML. In military parlance, "fire and forget. The Track Changes feature is wonderful Otherwise, again, corruption spreads through the document. Now in my experience the forward versions are a lot more stable, but then you must deal with the ribbon. Same with section marks -- ever see a document suddenly turn landscape? Now you probably know why. But then newer versions of Word papered over those problems somewhat, leading to inconsistent behaviors, even if they do what you meant most of the time.
For novel writing and it would be fine for non fiction too, particularly that without extensive formulas and the like Scrivener is brilliant. I wrote up a detailed why on my blog too that explains the fundamental differences between Scrivener and a "traditional" word processor like Word.
Fullwrite was one of my favorites. One of my biggest fundamental objections with Word is that formatting is a hidden property of every character and has a tendency to bleed every which way.
How often has one been working on a simple Word doc -- even an email -- where you end up see more with different basic styles fonting, indentation, point size for no apparent reason? There are multiple problems with the MS Monoculture. One of the major problems is that alternatives are fighting an extremely uphill battle. They also end up emulating the MS program to make popular definition essay writer sites sf easier popular definition essay writer sites sf users to switch.
So, it is stiffing progress by both cutting off cash flow and by vendors implementing features in the same way. Concerning the abstract thinking style vs. The thing I found interesting was that I used to have a pretty good Word rant myself, and even though I write more than ever, it was interesting to realize that most of my horror stories were at least ten years old. Even with significant Word experience, I found myself looking through drop-down menus, looking for the command I needed.
With Word never usedbut from what I have gleaned, the ribbon there was quite a lot worseI find it a lot easier to find the functionality. Tech authors still get to use text based markup systems Popular definition essay writer sites sf, Markdown, reStructuredText, etc using programmer editors such as Vim, Emacs, SublimeText.
Fortunately, there click here lots of FREE alternatives to MS Office. LibreOffice is my choice as an installable app and there are web-based options aplenty. The only MS app I still use regularly is Excel - no Word or PowerPoint for me! I really miss a feature in my Pipeline word processor for the Z a constant page preview where each character is one pixel so you could get a good overview of what the page would look like: I found it a good match for what I needed to see during composition.
What I currently use for writing novels is Scrivener. Yes, it will work with Markdown if I feel like it. Or generate LaTeX output. Yes, you can point it at a directory popular definition essay writer sites sf git or subversion control.
No, there are no idiotic "wizards" and "intelligent assistants". For writing business letters Others have mentioned OpenOffice in these comments. Like much of the popular open source software for desktop computing uses, it is bad precisely because it tries to copy the leading commercial application.
My own hatred of MSWord comes from the way it was hacked together by programmers who do not write very much. Word is a terrible tool for writing.
The market dominance is bad, yes, and it has led to the programming community being led down the path that seeks to copy badness. The use of RTF limits the extent to which the copying-how-MS-did-it-wrong causes problems.
They also force the competition to conform to their badness. Coders generally write badly when they attempt it and they ignore the complaints of writers when they get it wrong. This is similar to the bad rendering standards for the web, where P tags are typically separated by vertical http://piernassexy.co/research-paper-ghostwriter-websites.php with ragged right rather than existing in the indented, popular definition essay writer sites sf flow that was converged upon over hundreds of years.
It should be noted that RTF is a proprietary format created by Microsoft, and previously developed in tandem with new versions of Word. While it is a little less tied to the implementation details than. Tools for working with it are generally using some ill-defined subset, since the full specification supports almost everything Word might want to embed.
Right-justified English text is actually harder to read than ragged-right -- you lose cues about your position in long paragraphs. I had the same usability studies drummed into me in my techwriter days but they are all 90s-era discussions dealing with the problems of bad and low-resolution rendering. So MS made a terrible piece of crap and TeX remained generally inaccessible.
If you ever used Word for DOS 5. Hint: by "spreadsheet user interface" he was describing something not unlike Lotus or maybe MultiPlan. Re outliners -- have you looked in the mindmap aisle?
Freemind and Xmind, for example, can be used for outlining purposes. Freemind never seems to have progressed beyond version 0. XMind is a bit more professional, and the free version is perfectly functional. What I want to know is, when is someone going to roll TeX up in a bundle with a folding syntax-directed editor that can run on the iPad and export either DVI, PDF, or raw LaTeX files?
LaTeX has come a long way, or rather the front-ends for creating LaTeX documents. The leader is possibly the free TeXShop for the Mac, but there are other, similar systems, popular definition essay writer sites sf of them cross-platform, such as Texmaker. These give you previews of the PDF output of pdfTeX within the application, and synchronisation between the raw text kann popular business plan writers service us ich the preview e.
And LaTeX arguably still produces the highest standard of typesetting of any system, commercial or non-commercial.
XeTeX even lets you used fonts installed into your system, rather than having to follow the arcane procedures for installing fonts into La TeX. I agree that Word, at present, is a bloated abortion.
It peaked at version 5. When the company I was working for at the time forced us all onto PC laptops and Word, I just about cried. Yes at BT when we switched to Word we had a on day accelerated course that concentrated on how to use popular definition essay writer sites sf - Recently I was the one that had to set up the base document popular definition essay writer sites sf a load of site audits for Reed Elsiveer as none of my colleges knew anything about styles and outlining in word.
I have a soft for the old IBM Displaywite systems hard sectored 8 inch floppys that had a distinctive shakespeare studies essay sample sound when accessing a popular definition essay writer sites sf. I bought my latest Dell computer two years ago.
Like previous Dell PCs it came with a copy of Microsoft Word, in this write me popular admission essay on usa something called "Premium Family Edition". Unlike the previous Dell Go here I see more though, this version of worse was crippled in its functions and it had advertising.
Also, something which I was to forget, It had a limited life span of two years, along with Excel and the other stuff in the crippled MS Office suite that came with my PC. My boss has stayed a dedicated WordPerfect user from Ver. This combo also lets build a file structure that supports how I work, as I need to move between references and my writing fairly robustly.
In short, do as Hanlon commands: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. Yes, the original Microsoft Word for DOS was based very much around the same interface style as Microsoft MultiPlan, right down to the menu structure. The principal difference was that the menu key was Escape in Word and slash in MultiPlan. It was interesting as an example of a pre-IBM CAA standardized menu UI: the menu was at the bottom of the screen, in a horizontal flow of text, and displayed breadcrumbs as you navigated the hierarchy.
Back in those days, style sheets were treated by Word as independent entities -- ". The discussions of early versions of Word led me down a rabbit hole to a couple of interesting posts from MS staff.
First, this series written at the time of the Popular definition essay writer sites sf 12 redesign the ribbon. AroundI checked out a great little program for change tracking by a crowd popular definition essay writer sites sf in or called Cambridge.
Microsoft Word soon incorporated minimal change tracking functionality what we have nowand they disappeared, AFAIK. To popular definition essay writer sites sf an idea of what they offered, if you moved a chunk of text from one place to another, the software would show deleted source, inserted target, and a CURVED ARROW linking the two locations. I Sie cheap resume editing service london hatte writing novels before authors had personal computers in the UK at least and Word looks like a very useful tool to me.
It does the basic task I need quite well, and the collaboration tools are very good. I mean, how common do they think touchscreens are in a business environment? Oh, and did I mention multiple people work on the same document simultaneously? Without that last bit, everything would have been easy. If people are strictly disciplined in how they write or if you start with the one good document your team published three years ago, and just edit popular definition essay writer sites sf heck out of it then it can be a very reasonable tool.
I kind of think Word 5. Interesting as a historical note, but not as a criticism of the product. The ribbon first featured in Officeas a seemingly genuine attempt to tackle the labyrinth of features that had found popular definition essay writer sites sf way into the applications. That is definitely click at this page odd move if popular definition essay writer sites sf still want to sell in a business environment, though, and it will be interesting to see if they stick with that direction.
Anything popular definition essay writer sites sf into this document will adopt the formatting of the line into which it popular definition essay writer sites sf being pasted. I cannot think of a single instance, ever, when I wanted the formatting from some web page to be carried over into my document.
Much fun was had by Yours Truly converting random formats yeah, Word, mostly to something usable by PageMaker etc. Illegible on the screen leading to many a dead-tree-pulp printout and re-integrating changesimpossible to layout so it looks the same on any 2 PeeCees.
I wrote my MSc dissertation in Lotus I usually WRITE in a text editor -- preferably one not designed by someone who thinks only programmers use text editors. Word for Mac 5. And from Word for Windows 2. NB: the word processor I used a lot in the mid-to-late s was Borland Sprint formerly marketed as FinalWord.
Of course, it crashed and burned in the market The results were not publishable for quite some time. As Roger Zelazny said, the way to become a novelist is to start by writing a million words of crap, and these were my million words.
I think that there is a flag that popular definition essay writer sites sf can set under auto text or some such, I only use Word at work. If you press it, you get the option to select how it is pasted, including the option to popular definition essay writer sites sf all popular definition essay writer sites sf. And complex figures and images will be a lot less intuitive to work with directly popular definition essay writer sites sf a text-editor workflow.
Nor is preparing a document usually a one-way process: you will want to go back and edit the file later, maybe let other people edit it too, so the annotations need to be as unobtrusive as possible or invisible, as is the case in a WYSIWYG system. This is what formats like markdown, ReStructured Text etc try to do, but they tend to make simple formatting easy at the cost of making complex formatting impossible without "breaking out" into another markup language like HTMLand over-loading punctuation marks which might also need to appear in the output.
I think the "WYSIWYM" idea is a better compromise, where regardless of the actual file format used the user is applying approximate styles which can be fine-tuned later at the rendering stage. When we reach a place where software architecture allows us to select [and perhaps even write our own] functional modules - hey, Adobe did it for Photoshop - then we might have a chance. The problems with the entire Microsoft ecosystem are legion, and stem from the early Microsoft push for dominance.
Every time a competitor introduced a "cool new feature" Microsoft bolted it on to their products too, without logic, rhyme or reason. ODF might possibly have brought us half way to a workable solution: we now have a logical, structured and vendor-neutral data format.
Now we need to be brave enough to throw away the vestige of popular definition essay writer sites sf word processing and begin again, blank slate. Problem is, programmers are frightened that the cognitive change is beyond most users. Sometimes you have to make a leap of faith, into the unknown.
Whenever I get really bored at work, I change the extension of a Word document from. Try it some time. That shows how bad things are. Word never quite commits to either, but allows just enough functionality to tempt people in, but not enough to reliably perform the functions needed. As with so much in the field, it seems to have blundered into success. We had Office Popular definition essay writer sites sf on the systems at the college whilst I was using Office or similar at home.
Things as basic as paragraph numbering for example. The more edits between the sites would add a massive reformatting overhead. There are other benefits with LaTeX that often go unnoticed such as making use of variables that can be passed in during compilation.
LaTeX is also really easy to edit from your favourite text editor, for me this is vim, for you it could be Word. Can you save it as plain text from Rhetorical analysis essay writers service au without smartquotes messing things angegebene custom blog post editor website gb dieser Really useful things such as registers and a whole host of movement commands that allow the author to work at the speed of thought.
People would do well to spend some time reading the help files as there are a lot of features that can save the lumbering mass of the business world a lot of time. When I have to do things from my phone I find it very helpful to edit in vim, within screen on a remote server. I know the server will remain running despite local network issues, and that over a low baud rate I can still do things well.
And then we have people: Nobody knows how to use styles. And why should they? The last copies of Word I installed on popular definition essay writer sites sf client site were a CD and popular definition essay writer sites sf 5-user license.
The only "documentation" was the registration card. The last version of Word I personally used ran on MSDOS, but at least it shipped with real paper documentation.
Thank you for this. I was running a resume service popular definition essay writer sites sf quickly discovered that the initial release had a type-ahead buffer of only 50 words per minute. MS apparently thought non-UNIX geeks were competent to test software used by legal secretaries. My assumption is you already know this stuffright? The Protect Document feature limits formatting to styles that you specify. To use it, first create a document or template and define the styles you want to use.
Then choose Tools Protect Document to open the Protect Document pane. In the Protect Document pane, choose Limit formatting to a selection of styles, and then choose Popular definition essay writer sites sf to open the Formatting Restrictions dialog box. Are you saying this is a user problem or a bug problem? Never mind that Word is the easiest way around to deliver malicious code. And even then the reviewers are facing embedded documents, embedded software, text boxes sitting a thousand yards offscreen because of a formatting error, fonts that are illegible and cannot be converted to plain text, and other squamous horrors too terrible to name.
What makes you think learn more here paper documentation, were it popular definition essay writer sites sf to exist, would be better than the digital version? It all comes down to "discoverability" and continue reading UI - documentation is only useful once you know what to look for, and different people will frame the problem differently.
For many, these use cases enjoy Word as short-term and practical. I do whatever writing I do in plain text or HTML and CSS. For me, HTML is a container. I also have FrameMaker 8 at home. Began with version 6. Before that, I did multiple files and stylesheets with WordPerfect for DOS.
But as the years roll by, I use FrameMaker less. Chapter 18, the last chapter, the last sentence reads. This book was entirely written in HTML and CSS. Third edition, CopyrightISBN At the time Lie and Bos credited the Prince formatter. They are still around. I just finished my first novel popular definition essay writer sites sf Word, but I share your contempt. I hate Word with the fire of a thousand suns. Network effects are a bitch. My experience is that even if you try to use "best practices" for styles, workflow, etc, you are still going to get punched in the dick or ovaries on a regular basis by bizarre, unpredictable, or just plain stupid layout and formatting behavior.
I wrote that entire rant while signed in as my wife. The tension between structural vs. Professionals are willing to pay the price of disciplined editing because they will earn its benefits; normal end-users will not earn any benefits, so disciplined editing is a waste of time for them.
So, when someone is participating on a long-lived documentation project, they must popular definition essay writer sites sf the professional tools and workflows.
That may mean normal end-users must first learn how to edit in a disciplined way. That way lies insanity and double the work to undo embedded styling and to re-apply semantic tags. Better to do that kind of work intentionallyfrom the very beginning. Let Word, Google Docs and its ilk take care of all those use cases. I am editor of a small magazine, and we do all predesign writing and collaboration in Google Drive.
I love the subversive act Go You know, there is another answer: then "Word is better"- that answer is "the cost of converting all existing documents and teaching all custom school content sample to use a new word-processing tool is more then the problem is worth".
Essentially you can rely on most people who apply to work knowing how to work with Word, at least somewhat. Knowledge of,say, Scrivener, is much less common. I wrote a couple books on Python and decided to paint my bike shed pink and created restructured text tools to create ebooks both epub and mobi  and latex from the same source.
At the time Kindle formatting was such a pain that I also wrote a book chronicling my ebook formatting woes as well. And I only need to edit one file, and type a command to build an ebook or p book. They used to be known for making fast, clean, useful services and did so with a minimum of what might be called "evil. Well, it might not have. When I did my MSc, very early in popular definition essay writer sites sf studies I moved to LaTeX after Word mangled up my equations in one exercise and I had to print the document out using WP.
It was the best thing for it, but the layout requirements for the thesis were easiest to accommodate by writing a LaTeX document class for it.
I gave that to the department to distribute, and at least one other student used that class for their thesis. Of popular definition essay writer sites sf the requirements changed some time after that and there was nobody to update the document class anymore. I still like it if I need equation layout at home. Word is the worse of them, mostly because even though I have templates the styles of popular definition essay writer sites sf seem to fail at random times.
At home I usually just write plain text, using either vim, Emacs or Kate, depending. Word is the here one to go when writing letters, and for bigger projects I got Scrivener because popular definition essay writer sites sf here by OGH and it seems to be a very good tool.
Popular definition essay writer sites sf started with MS-DOS programs, and Teko a Finnish word processor and WP5. Http://piernassexy.co/biography-writing-websites-australia.php was a nice editor - I never used the Unix ones until I got into the university. I remember doing some school project popular definition essay writer sites sf Lotus when the chart drawing part was a separate program.
Once, during a boring night of sky measuring, I realized that the workplace had a complete set of VMS manuals on a shelf, and the computer I was using was a VMS box. I managed to create and edit a file with TECO, but after that night I saw the case for Emacs.
The thing that is killing Word is the iPad. RTF, plain text and Google Docs format are my choices. They all work great and no Microsoft tax. I was popular definition essay writer sites sf introduced to Microsoft Word on DOS in the late s when it was still a very minor player in the word processing field.
On MS-DOS at least, the program was in fact quite usable once you wrapped your head around the weird interface press Esc to invoke a menu, anyone? DesqView briefly offered some sanity and a window of opportunity for sane projects, but that was killed off by the same market manipulation that killed DR-DOS.
I thought SGML and specifically DocBook held some promise at least for the kinds of documentation it was designed for and backed by several free software projectsbut the race to XML why? And of course, for each project you want to work on, you face the hurdle of selling semantic markup to a new set of blank faces raised on Microsoft Word.
So yes, I concur emphatically. Microsoft Word needs to die. We will live with the popular definition essay writer sites sf for generations to come anyway, but the world needs to rid itself of that pest. See also my post I have tried to use an iPlod precisely ONCE. Heteromeles, Coming late to this party, so someone may have replied to you already not going to read through posts to find out. If you have more than one project on it may be useful. If you consider the Scrivener patient dead, then please ignore.
Strange though it might be Greg, a chunk of the rest of the world does use iPads enthusiastically. And one of the things they want to know about cheap ghostwriter service toronto a low-step process for integrating it into their workflow. Lots of other systems add an extra step to integrate through Dropbox. Given how long the change from HTML 4. The file format is open, well documented and it is my impression that it is also sane.
Both programs are open source, so someone could take popular definition essay writer sites sf file format libraries and write their own UI popular definition essay writer sites sf top. Microsoft Word is a living fossil, but not half as vestigal as the protocols that make up email. I would put email out of its misery without hesitation. It sounds to me that if Word is not the best tool to do lots of specialist layout and typesetting and versioning then you should be making a business case to use a more appropriate tool for these jobs.
Would we have had a word processor war to match the browser wars? Would the market for computers be as large? It has a change control system that, on a good day with a fair wind, vaguely works. So folk can easily move edits around for review and approval. No, I just like devils advocate. Hey Charlie, is there some new hoop to jump through in order for a comment to show up?
I attempted to post a comment, but it seems to be in the aether instead of nestled snuggly in this thread. Our new cross-device world mobiles, tablets, netbooks, tvs, watches FFS is making the need to understand more of the semantics of the content - rather umgekehrt literature review ghostwriting site liverpool ganzheitlich just the output formatting - to do an effective job of getting the right information in the right place at the right time.
CAN HAZ REVEAL CODEZ? The anti-spam plugin seems to have raised an eyebrow at several comments in the past 24 hours. Possibly something to do with the order-of-magnitude traffic increase on the blog normally:unique visits a day; Saturday 12th: 88, unique visits. This happened while I was in bed, sleeping off an exhausting work week followed by a couple of back-to-back economy-class flights. More than one word: Smartquotes and the inability to fix them, either in place or to the point that they are correct, has driven popular definition essay writer sites sf batty on a number of book projects.
I like OpenOffice, but there were things that it was not compatible with. Found all your same points, just with less experience than you. Well written arguments; I could popular definition essay writer sites sf agree more.
Users are then unable to apply manual overrides to the underlying styles. All manual formatting is disabled, and becomes greyed out on the formatting toolbar. A page tech manual with numbered headings, numbered figures and lots of tables is a piece of cake.
To make it easy for users, you need to make a custom toolbar with all permitted styles on it. This is trivially easy in W, but MS removed this most useful feature in W, alas. However, W recognises and uses custom toolbars created in Popular definition essay writer sites sf, so you need to jump through a few hoops or create the custom toolbar in W for Mac, which retains this capability.
With a custom toolbar, using Word becomes very easy for your users, as there are only 2 rules. This makes it easy to fix a doc - find popular definition essay writer sites sf pink text and give it a permitted style from the custom toolbar.
Life becomes so popular definition essay writer sites sf easier. No more user-created spaghetti formatting - this becomes a distant memory. BTW, my first job as a tech author was on a college placement at a now defunct software outfit where Mr Stross was working. While there are some grains of facts in the rant of Mr. Stross, the vast majority is incorrect or inaccurate or simply wrong. Doing the blended model was however never much of a debate within Microsoft as the chief architect of Word, Charles Simony brought the blended model with him from GUI word processors he had done at Xerox Parc.
This model is not perfect at all, werden write me university essay on pokemon go und there are many cases for user confusion, and http://piernassexy.co/custom-thesis-statement-editor-websites-for-school.php formatting tied to the "paragraph mark" can be confusing.
The problem is that we could never invent a better model back then in the 90s we triedand nobody has been able to do it since either. It should not be. Styles are for people who understand publishing. The other gripes about the Word binary file format and the changes seem to originate with a person who tries to understand complex data structures like a binary file format, without really having the capacity or training.
Lastly, in many ways the Word architecture is optimal. That is why nobody has really tried in 20 years. In Word you can open apage document, and make 20 quick edits and save without it taking most of the afternoon. Try to do this in Open Office Word processor You do popular definition essay writer sites sf that this is exactly why many consider Libreoffice Writer to be the superior tool. Simply by virtue of being a later development to replace Word, it has many of your gripes being ironed out.
A short example being the file format: OpenDocument is a real file formatunlike a memomery popular definition essay writer sites sf. This is a trick question. In my business, the useful life of a document is "life of author plus 70 years" -- thank you, Berne Convention. On the other hand, in most business sectors the life expectancy of a document is about three to six months, and document retention beyond the requirements of law -- typically 7 years -- is actively discouraged.
As I mentioned, I worked on Word frombut left the company in It seems the you think that Word is somehow impacting the life span of your documents. Can you be specific. As far as I know, you can open and edit documents created in Word 20 years ago As an aside, you need to remember that Word is a product for the masses of popular definition essay writer sites sf and consumer users whose average document is 2 pages long.
Publishing Professionals, have many other specialized tools at their disposal. The problem is that many professional authors like to use a convenient tool like Word but resent that it does not support all the specialized needs that professional writers have.
This was done by specific INTENT. We made a conscious decision when building Word 2. These two markets have divergent needs that cannot easily be reconciled in one product. It was clearly the right decision in hindsight, as Word 2. Incidentally, this decision to not cater to professional authors, turned James Gleick Chaos into a rabid MS Word hater Charlie, I used to be an IT trainer specialising in training complete noobs in how to use MS Office.
The exceptions to that were people who were already proficient in another word-processor, usually WordPerfect 5. It took at least twenty times as long for them to popular definition essay writer sites sf proficiency in Word than it took complete beginners. The more they knew about WordPerfect the longer it took them to learn Word. I could teach a beginner how to do basic tasks with Word in a single four-hour session.
Written in Word 5. Inaccessible in anything recent on the Mac. The problem kicked in when Word achieved such total ubiquity that businesses which should really have known better began to insist that all their workflow popular definition essay writer sites sf based around Word -- including publishers, law firms, and others with special needs.
We will all go to the first publisher who supports this. Well popular definition essay writer sites sf are bugs in sw and Word has its fair share. Have you contacted MS about your problem. Splitting the code base to cater to hard core publishing needs would not have been that simple. Basically the Word layout engine does not understand how "think" like a DPT tool. It would have had to be a completely new tool, like MS Publisher eventually became MS struggles with the idea of making products for niche markets.
It makes no sense to build for a K unit per year market when other products do million units. It just makes no economic sense. The fact that the entire publishing supply chain has standardized on low cost products like Word is not really the fault of Word or MS. You can blame the company popular definition essay writer sites sf many things I certainly do Every single long term user of Word on the Mac has the same problem Charlie Stross has with old files becoming unreadable in anything new.
Which, by the way, is a big factor in why so many of us loathe the application and refuse to use it for anything serious. Hint: out of mating season octopi consider other octopi to be food Was there any thought just click for source your period at MS that file formats would be changed so that early adopters would drive sales by forcing late adopters to upgrade?
MS policy or not? If OGH is correct that current editions of Word cannot read the oldest versions I cannot test thisthen this nicely circles back to the idea of proprietary formats resulting in a "dark age".
What is the consensus about what we should we be using for archival purposes? As a long-forgotten denizen of alt. As I mentioned in an earlier post, the Mac version does allow you to create a custom menu, a feature that was removed from the Win version in AFAIAC, the locked styles feature is useless without a custom menu if you are deploying it to other less-than-expert users. They need an easy way to click a locked doc, and a custom menu provides exactly that.
In W, if a user clicked on a manual formatting icon, a dialog box appeared and told the user that formatting could only be applied using styles. The styles pane then opened. This was helpful to users by pointing them in the right direction. In W, this helpful action disappeared and nothing happened if the user clicked an icon, leaving the user none the wiser and clueless as to how to proced. So the whole locked styles feature has become a mess. You can initiate it on Link, but not on a Mac, although the Mac version will observe the feature.
You cannot create a custom menu on Win, but you can on a Mac. What used to be a dead simple power user feature on W has been turned into a total wreck with the change to the ef Fluent interface aka Ribbon, or Noddy Bar, as I prefer to call it. This is the main problem with MS - they arbitrarily remove features, especially power features.
A popular definition essay writer sites sf colleague has "upgraded" to Office and reports that Visio has become unusable for the type of work he does.
Funny you should mention that; I was about to make a comment about the same with regard to LaTeX. See, with LaTeX, you can sorta go both ways and it is indeed the fact that people who are in the throws of learning LaTeX which popular definition essay writer sites sf a steep learning curve in the non-technical sense go with the sorta WYSIWYG style of formatting, only to later master extending old environments or creating their own.
Same with Word, right? The only difference is again, very broadly speaking is that LaTeX has always been a command line thing and always will be. This is not the case for word processors with GUI front-ends. The command line interface makes you actually stop and think a little bit. Here at Take Control Books, where we started with Word because it was the only way to produce a decent PDF with a tool popular definition essay writer sites sf all our authors and editors had and could use as opposed to InDesignwe switched first to Pages and then, best ghostwriters for college Apple ignored its bugs and limitations for too many years, to the resurgent Nisus Writer Pro, which is a wonderfully powerful, occasionally quirky word processor from a company that actually listens to feedback and fixes bugs and other infelicities.
We write and edit in Nisus Writer Pro, thanks to its popular definition essay writer sites sf change tracking and commenting and styling capabilities, and then use a custom-built macro to convert that to Markdown to feed into Leanpub. That gives us a great-looking PDF popular definition essay writer sites sf from Nisus, and EPUB and Mobipocket versions popular writing services ca Leanpub that use our custom CSS styles.
Did I mention that Nisus Writer Pro has a full macro language built in? Those of us who deal with academic, professional, and legal documents have long despised all word processors Here are a few examples: 1 Not all italics are italics.
The problem here is not with the file format. It is with the user interface. However, no popular definition essay writer sites sf processor does that. The flip side of this is that other citation-and-format systems are equally arrogant, if not more so. The Blue Book actually, that should be in small caps, not italics Cheap thesis writer website toronto, that should be "U. Yes, really — it used to be "F.
The less said about all of the unnecessary periods, which lead to inconsistent word counts, the better So, much as I despise the way Word not to mention most other word processors — WordPerfect was better than most, but far from perfect has implemented some of these systems, any implementation was going to resemble verb forms in Popular definition essay writer sites sf lots of irregular verbs, including some of the most common.
Proclaiming that the s-zed can be represented by ss which might get split by a hyphenation algorithm does not make it so, particularly not when trying to accurately quote another document.
However, if I try to code that into my default keyboard, I have to give up access to click here command So does received-wisdom advice on changing line length to match some purported ideal which is inaccurate for those of us who wear glasses, whether reading on paper or on screen, in any event.
I have loads of 5. Believe it or not, the situation is even worse on Win. At some point, MS decided that it would disable allowing older docs to be opened for "security" reasons. Fine for orgs with IT departments.
But I sympathise and feel the pain, believe me. The whole MS Word landscape is a total nightmare. For me, the only thing that makes it in any way usable is the locked styles feature, which simplifies life by an order of magnitude. Even then, MS has downgraded it and made it far worse and more complicated from W onward.
For popular definition essay writer sites sf, the problem starts with the way I learned to type: namely, on a typewriter. Yeah, old fashioned popular definition essay writer sites sf, with a platen and a bunch of keys, and a keyboard which was so stiff after years of high school students hammering away on the thing that getting individual keys to function just about required a hammer and chisel.
I learned to lay out documents by hand - centring headings, underlining subheadings etc. The first word processor I used the first office product suite I used was called "First Choice". So was italic text, on the screen. Font sizes and such were set by the printer dot matrix popular definition essay writer sites sf your only options were to make the text bold or italic.
I wrote a number of university essays using Esl home work ghostwriting service for college Choice during my first ever attempt at a university degree. I came to Word and the MS Office suite or rather, the popular definition essay writer sites sf version of same known by the hideous misnomer of MS Works when I finally purchased my own PC, in about MS Works did most of the stuff that Word did, but it did them badly, and it saved the files in a completely incompatible format of its own.
Not only were Works documents incompatible with every other word processor known to humanity, they were also incompatible with the MS Popular definition essay writer sites sf suite in what seems to me to have been a triumph of MS lunacy. Genuine "write once, read never" documents. This was during my various tenures with a Major Government Read article, who used Lotus GeschГftsleute popular admission essay editor sites for phd und for email, and got the Lotus office suite as a freebie along with that; rather than pay extra for Word, they used the Lotus Freebie.
It was during my long stint with the Major Government Department I finally discovered how I work best as a writer: if I write in Notepad, I get actual text on the page, and then I can copy and paste it into a word processor and use that to pretty things up to a point. Read article and paste the original into Notepad, which keeps the letters in order, but strips out all the formatting.
Then copy and paste the copy in Notepad into your clean document. Apply formatting to your finished document as necessary. My preference is for Notepad. The day I got a copy of the Concise Oxford Dictionary on CD was a godsend for me - it cut the amount of swearing at spell check I was doing by about two thirds.
They may have added that since my last attempt. Its own macros, check. Professional problem solving writing site for phd as a native format, check. Everything else seems to be there The saddest thing is that the starting point was a perfectly functional LaTeX document, but Management decided to impose a uniform file format, so naturally chose Word.
I do not mean to be disrespectful, but popular definition essay writer sites sf sounds like you wish us to thank Microsoft for its monopolistic practices. For me, the statistics you mention confirm that foul play was afoot.
It is about things like laws requiring perennity for official documents like birth certificates has been a foundation of public administration since the 18th Century at leastpolicies requiring computerisation of administration not an unreasonable ideaand implementation of the policy by the purchase of Microsoft licences uh oh As a LaTeX user forced to use MS-Word for certain business, I loath every second of my life that is wasted re-setting font sizes or colours because Word propagates random styles like the plague.
Blame the market research team for that one. Rant about it in a blog I this web page It was never intended for writing fiction.
As the corporate execs and attorneys were still mostly male in those days, and Real Men Do Not Type, that was the deal. But you needed understand how it popular definition essay writer sites sf -- and that memory thang was a difficult concept for most people to grasp back in those days -- particularly as there was no screen to see what you were doing.
You recorded to magnetic cards, as with main frames. The real selling point was you recorded your work on magnetic cards that could be read by anyone else, and the read more picked up from there. Popular definition essay writer sites sf were very cool machines, and I could play them like a first violinist plays her instrument. In fact I did write the first drafts of the earlier chapters on the Mag Card -- it was GREAT!
As long as I looked busy I was fine. They knew what I was doing too. But being lawyers they admired double billing and had no troubles with how I occupied myself when not setting up conference calls and so on. Word and other word processing programs for personal computers then, followed the codes and so on from the IBM Mag Card -- and still do today. Which is why it popular definition essay writer sites sf so easy for me to transition.
The funny thing though -- publishing was the very last to get correcting typewriters, which is what the IBM Mag Card ultimately was, much less Mag Cards at all -- and the last industry to get computers on the desks of the editors and so on.
Collective bargaining works when you have a bunch of people with a shared interest. But authors are basically small businesses providing semi-interchangeable content for large multinationals that run a production line. The WHATWG standard that resulted has no version number, and codifies a lot of existing practices as well as creating new ones.
The W3C graciously accepted defeat and started drafting HTML 5 as a snapshot of that standard. The general consensus seems to be to stop worrying too much about version numbers, and think instead about a well-documented eco-system with well-defined rules of interoperability and backwards-compatibility. It suits the web well, which is about as decentralised as any publishing medium can be.
More formal modes of publishing may want to be more conservative about exactly what standards are accepted and expected. Vim is better than Word any day. Also, Microsoft ruined Word when they implemented the Ribbon. The other day, I opened a document; and all of popular definition essay writer sites sf headings had lost their numbers, and the step numbers had disappeared.
I had to replace normal. As I understand it, SGML was an extremely versatile, but therefore extremely complicated "meta-grammar", which made it very tricky popular definition essay writer sites sf implement truly general-purpose SGML tools. XML, on the other hand, restricts it down to a rigid set of rules which can be easily implemented and tested.
So an Popular definition essay writer sites sf DocBook toolchain would likely have consisted of more specialised tools for dealing with that particular format, whereas as an XML schema, a huge number of off-the-shelf libraries and technologies can be brought to bear.
Processors for things like DOM, XPath, XSLT, etc, are near-ubiquitous building blocks for anything you might want to do with an XML application. Nice non-sequitur there: start complaining about a controversial UI change, then proceed with an anecdote about data corruption. Later, MS used it to have a low-end offering without dropping the value of Office, but the two really had no relationship to one another.
They did this a lot - "Outlook Express" was nothing to do with "Outlook", but the brand had respect and now Hotmail has become Outlook. From the outside this kind of thing always seems baffling - the company appears to be competing with itself - but it seems to be more successful than trying to use one team to produce products for multiple niches. Laptops these days come with a aspect ratio -- widescreen, for displaying media such as movies -- in contrast to the earlier ratio.
If the ribbon could be positioned left or right of a scroll of text, it would be fine. But instead, it tries to hog the top of the scroll of text in a window -- reducing the vertical real estate in which the document being edited can be displayed. So: problem exists commands are buried too deep in menus: how to expose them to the user? And those ways are idiosyncratic. You really should leave systems in place to make things more flexible, not less. But the nice people in Cupertino let you put the dock to the left or right as well.
There are some others where you can generate your own button bars these are common in games but you see them in other applications too - and quite a few browsers let you do it now and some give you quite a bit of control over where you place the buttons.
More power to the users That might sound odd coming from someone who is a life-long Mac owner - but actually the standard menu bar fixes your screen real-estate. Whatever size screen you have, every user, every UI designer knows that bit of the screen is there for menus and only for menus and these days menubar apps.
Very interesting article, and comment stream full of interesting info! I do Word for a living. But I agree that the whole edifice is tottering and weird. Numbering is peculiar, and only seems to work if you invoke dread Cthulhu. But, then again, I do things with it I would never have dreamed of doing with WordPerfect, or DisplayWrite, or Wang, or any of them. They want to format, however much we discourage it.
And they have more clout than we do. Since they know how to use it, and I know how to use it, it gets used. But, yeah, the ribbon is an abomination. The screen-layout problem is incredibly commonplace. I wonder, sometimes, if assumptions about the screen layout are built into the API, just as using OpenGL for graphics seems to be associated with an ugly set of colours for the UI, a default shit-brown colour scheme. I started with text formatting at Bell Labs in the late s, so used troff and a macro package.
For the size things that I wrote -- pages, small tables, modest numbers of equations, limited line-and-box style drawings -- it was really good. Quick to learn, reasonably attractive not as good as TeX-based stuff would bepopular definition essay writer sites sf the same text editor that my fingers already knew, same version control tools as used for source code. At least the first cut at the table looks good, with reasonable alignment, padding and lines.
Charlie, I think you would on essay critical best to pay trump write hated whatever word processor rose to dominate publishing, regardless of who wrote it. Microcomputer software has always succeeded by being cheap, easy to use, and just good enough for small jobs. Which pushes the more appropriate expert software into a smaller market, which pushes up the price, MS Word, Word Perfect, etc have always been cheaper than FrameMaker, Quark Express, InDesign.
Probably more importantly, so are people who know how to use MS Word, or at least think they do. I popular definition essay writer sites sf appreciate your explanation of the fundamental design error that enables Word to behave so erratically.
I miss Ami Pro, in which word processor I was most productive and agile. IBM bought them out and came up with Lotus Word Pro; it was likely a functional rewrite by teams of Java-plodders; it was probably less buggy than Ami Pro, but it was slow as molasses; made it unusable on hardware I had access to at the time.
I have not seen any word processor actually it was essay writer definition services school for esl tolerable layout editor too, something that is worse than unsupported in Word of comparable quality since. Charlie, you are a man after my own heart, a kindred soul.
Your article is a great relief to me. I have a special name for the files that are created every time my Word crashes on my Mac: Microsoft Sucks [1, 2, I am trying to learn Pages, trying very hard. But with tens of thousands of hours invested in so many different popular definition essay writer sites sf of Word, when I need to get something done quickly I force myself to endure, each time promising it will be the last.
I may keep my promise to myself, for I am retiring, and I hope that I will never again have to use Word. They finally added UI for file block in the trust center in Word I hate, hate, hate Microsoft Word. I still write with WordStar for DOS 7. You need text and hard returns.
We need a new word, for a monopoly that intentionally decides to screw its most outspoken locked-in customers in this manner. This grumpy posting brought to you by 13 data-loss events last week with PowerPoint yeah, I know and happy knowledge that something like 5 plus million first-gen Surfaceii must have been ground up this year For someone who has come accustomed to the drop down menu interface the ribbon menu has wasted a number of hours of my life I will never get back.
The funniest part is Microsoft just click for source try and charge you to remove it Here is my record convo with Microsoft You might have noticed a number of comments about the lack of ability of Windows machines to check back compatibility of Word files over time.
Or several other people. Such discussions are almost daily routine in my office environment. Arguments thrown forward and back, complex or simple in content, proven by examples or a matter of subject. However, as long as the users believe they cant use something else - they cant use something else.
And yes, Open- or LibreOffice are not real solutions, but I can live much better with the errors those programs cultivate.
Yes, me too was perfectly happy with the functions of 1st Word, WordPerfect and of the former Apple Works PPC Mac.
Those programs were fast, simple to learn and easy to master - and finally: they were build to write text. Best served with those. Simplify your life is a worthy mental setup for computer programs, popular definition essay writer sites sf as in other aspects of daily routine. Signed in just so I could comment I do wish I could do more formatting in Scrivener and I do wish Pages had a split screen view for documents, but both have been far more stable and more robust in combination than Word ever was.
And my Word-using colleagues are none-the-wiser. Every doc they get, I send in their format, no problem whatsoever.
Meanwhile, Word has never played nice. And not only because of the crashing. I have to correct one glaring error, which is the suggestion that Microsoft is competently managed. It is nothing of the sort. When I worked with FrameMaker some time ago now though we used it for revision tracking and planning, not just page layout.
The original Aldus PageMaker was only ever intended to be popular definition essay writer sites sf DTP layout program but had a simple word processor added because customers demanded it. And geeks who should know better are not immune to the temptation of popular definition essay writer sites sf one program to do everything, which is why Emacs gained email and newsgroup readers.
Maybe your salvation could come from the web design world? My friends and colleagues in that popular definition essay writer sites sf are starting to talk about the need for proper collaborative design and revision control in their "content management systems. Oh, yes - repeat Q. Are they Google patches, or are they o.
To cut a long story short, after governments started to demand that files be stored in a standard format Microsoft stuffed the relevant standards committee with proxies and rammed it through. And then returned to business as usual. Frame was indeed great, and I am pissed popular definition essay writer sites sf that Adobe pay for my cheap on shakespeare and killed it presumably to clear the field for InDesign.
But Frame was that rare beast, a tool designed for serious technical publishers: it had everything for document workflow -- and by document I mean "large, complex product manual" -- mostly in the right place. Replying to my self I use straight ASCII with no formatting codes. I had to print the whole thing out on a dot-matrix printer and mail the big box of paper to them. The second book, the publisher would only accept click in the latest version of WordPerfect.
That was in Back in the early s, popular definition essay writer sites sf there was more than one platform and OS, there was a book by Stewart Brand, "The Whole Earth Software Catalog. After evaluating about a dozen text editors and word processors, and learning about proprietary file formats the hard way, I picked an editor that suited me. It popular definition essay writer sites sf on MSDOS, which is what I was running then.
On the very rare occasions I need to do something outside its capabilities, I just root around in the menus to see what the current operating system offers. And, yes, there are still files on my computer, that have followed me across machines and OSs for almost thirty years Judging by the comments, the problem seems to be with the concept of "Word Processor". Producing something that can be embedded in an email, or displayed on webpage, or read on a Kindle is just as important as print now - and yet documents continue to be distributed as double-column PDF files.
Seeing what is wrong with Word is easy - but figuring out what we should be using instead is hard - partly popular definition essay writer sites sf a generation of using Word Processors has made us all popular definition essay writer sites sf the wrong way.
I read an article once by someone who worked on word, and other ms office products, popular definition essay writer sites sf a while about how the file formats ended up so convoluted and obscure. He said that this was a popular definition essay writer sites sf of maintaining compatibility between the many versions of word, excel, etc.
MS office has been pretty unusual in that you can not only open old versions which just popular definition essay writer sites sf a one way converter but can usually save documents to several older versions.
Its a pretty nightmarish thing to try to support, when you consider that they also popular definition essay writer sites sf some format compatibility between word, excel, powerpoint, etc. Not surprising it is a mess internally, particularly if their formatting scheme is fundamentally contradictory. In general I think we have used the power of computer document formatting mainly to waste time making things needlessly pretty, excluding actual publications popular definition essay writer sites sf mass distribution marketing materials, etc where perfection is a point.
People spend hours fiddling with margins, spacing, font sizes, lining up montages of images, etc on documents that only a few people who are being paid to look at the document will ever see simply because such polish is possible and immediate these days. Of course we have to make our documents pretty because our competitors make theirs pretty, and it is easy to demand minor fixes, even though the prettiness itself is really just a waste of time.
Sexual selection in text. Quick presentations weighed down by ridiculously ornate tail feathers. I just felt impelled to jump in and comment on the few mentions of importing Word files into Adobe InDesign. There is some confusion. You can strip out all styling info, strip it out but keep local formatting like bolds and italsmap Word styles to InDesign ones or even have the Word styles overwrite ID ones for insane people.
You can manage embedded art, page and section breaks, even tracked changes, all from the dialog box. This summer I authored a whole title on lynda. Along the way I discovered some useful style-related features of Word that few users are aware of, like the ability to show a color-coded number map of which styles para and char are used where in a doc, or being able to easily highlight all "direct formatting" local overrides of the same type throughout a doc at once and so easily fixed at once.
As a few commenter have noted, there are some easy fixes in Popular definition essay writer sites sf for some of the rants here, especially if you just turn off most of the AutoFormat as You Type options. Assuming you can find where that option is In our latest podcast at InDesignSecrets. Someone who knows their computer history! This was worth reading if for just click for source else than a concise and correct statement of how we got to where we are today.
I agree completely about Word. The same thing applies to Windows, too. Now that there are usable free alternatives - any number of flavours of linux, reliable, easy to use, more consistent than any MS product - the thing to do would be to junk MS altogether.
Thank you for your post and perspective. When linking through from TheBrowser to read it, I was not expecting to experience a flashback to I will be honest that much of the behind-the-scenes action in a word-processor still eludes me, but that you could pull the curtain back and peek in with an editor like VALDOCS remains with me. I have been using Word for a long time, but almost never create any document that could not have been handled by Word 1. I attribute our long and happy marriage to my knowing how to get her out of MSWord Style Stress aka major tantrum resulting from Word enabling her to tie her text styles into knots.
I suppose I should be grateful to MS Popular definition essay writer sites sf therefore. PS I regret the passing of functional software that came on a kilobyte single-sided Mac floppy. I remember Word 5 for Mac being denounced as bloatware because it came on 4 1.
IMO The main problem with windows is that it encourages fiefdoms. But can you name a major corporation that currently uses Linux on popular definition essay writer sites sf desktops? Do you want Dave or Sky channels to die for an unspecified period? SO, I am a little out of date, by now Another macro allows for arranging the two windows side by side. If you do not need live update for the duplicated document, this popular definition essay writer sites sf be all you are looking for with the occasional re-creation of a new duplicate from a fresher original.
Unfortunately live update is exactly what I need. Vim can be configured to do it, kinda-sorta. SGML, the culmination of 30 years of markup language development, was co-opted by the computer science community who produced XML. XML forced SGML to be sequentially parsed as http://piernassexy.co/best-biography-ghostwriter-websites-london.php machine-processed documents are for that matter, all computer code done today.
This is the real problem with documents. Not Word per se. After all these years there is still not a viable document tool on the market that implements SGML. Killing Word will not make that happen either. With such an SGML-based tool, documents could be processed in parallel with all its participants writing simultaneously. Files and folders would not exist. And there would be no such thing as merging various copies of documents.
The cloud is not the answer, which merely postpones simultaneous editing problems, so forget Office And in the process of "moving HTML forward", the people responsible have done two unforgivable things:. But for the HTML, which is meant to be a semantic markup language If anyone knows of one, please share it with popular definition essay writer sites sf. A lot of the new stuff in HTML5 is great the new form input types popular definition essay writer sites sf example.
But the way that tags are here today, and gone tomorrow e. SGML hurts my head. And where I am sitting, there is a copy of the Goldfarb book in direct line-of-sight. Oh, and thinking about word processing formats.
They popular definition essay writer sites sf open in LibreOffice without a trouble. Strange considering that LibreOffice is in a direct line of succession from StarOffice Oh, and Charlie: LibreOffice import filter for legacy Mac file-formats.
Forgive me if I offend you, but I have to say that some of what you say is true, but much of it is naive. If fact I used up all the machine storage that way. I was also an early SGML template designer and in fact formatted not only books but magazines, newspapers and even ads with SGML and with several of its precursors. As for Word the biggest problem with Word is not the fact that they NEVER research proposal writing site ca that expletive-deleted numbering problem but more to do with how much they underestimated the laziness of human beings who use word processing tools.
Why is that frustrating? But that just drove me to start my own business where I could mandate potential employees be able to prove they were craftspeople with their tools. As for ME, these days I use Word for all my continuous-text needs including writing articles, ghostwriting books for professors and building my various websites. I mean I have multiple. You can still program in Word. I do most of that automatically with programmed commands.
The only stupid thing Microsoft does is not really improving things from one release to the next, just obfuscating it. But what the heck Youtube, facebook and Google also have nonexistent usability popular definition essay writer sites sf, obviously.
One of the best things Word did was come up with the ribbon design in version Not that I use their ribbon, I still use my own macros for most things. I type in excess of wpm quite error-free and having to lift my hand to the mouse to get a ribbon item would be quite inefficient and drive me nuts.
However, like many writers who are also fast typists, I prefer to think and have my thoughts go directly to my fingers. I enjoy what Microsoft Office has done FOR ME financially, too. In the early 80s, I was making 65 bucks an hour working as a freelancer for a couple smaller ad agencies in the SF Bay Area. I produced ad layouts on an Apple LISA with an external TWO-MEGABYTE hard drive using Illustrator, Quark Xpress and Pagemaker.
But eventually all the design software that started out on the Apple systems moved over to popular definition essay writer sites sf better Dos machines, and so did my business.
I still love Best essay writer us and when you consider that XML is just a subset of SGML and HTML is just a DTD within SGML maybe you can understand more info. I can use it for all my writing needs, and even create what appears to be powerpoint slides in it, because I know Word to a deep level.
I do use PowerPoint for interactive slide presentations, however. The subcontractors will be submitting their design documents soon, and my Popular definition essay writer sites sf said I can comment and reject based on whether I can deal with the formatting masters on music my requirements management tool.
I used yWriter for several years, and found it got slow as my novel got to about 80K words. I switched to Scrivener largely because I saw your name listed as a user. They actually do a good job providing reasonably well integrated suites of products that all talk to each other and can be customized a bit for each institution. But it could be worse. Microsoft could buy Scrivener and do a crummy job integrating its features into Word or distribute a stripped-down version for free that only outputs.
I have bad news for you! Admittedly the project in question is currently around the K word mark, due to it being the first seven books in a series Before I try out the demo planned for some point in the next few weeks would you mind sharing some thoughts on whether or not it would be good for this?
The people behind Scrivener have also released a program called Scapple which might be useful for you. It links to Scrivener. Mac and Windows, free trial, just as with Scrivener. This sort of software might implement some of the ideas that were in Outliner programs in the MS-DOS era.
I think Word can emulate the presentation of data, but I am not sure it can be more than a visual fake. I am popular definition essay writer sites sf of buying Scapple myself. And professional bibliography for college websites ghostwriters may handle free-form notes better than Scrivener.
Well, I think that was kind of what made the WHATWG necessary: the W3C was wholly wedded to their dream of a semantic version of HTML, which would have been XHTML2. But nobody was actually using HTML that way - what they were doing was building rich UIs using it, and the W3C was doing very little to enable that.
To rather artificially drift back on topic, this also makes the kind of feature that amconcepcion mentioned, for spotting similar direct formatting and creating style rules after the fact, seem like a promising compromise.
Congratulations, you have just reinvented a rather complicated wheel, despite using entirely the wrong tools. Sure, you could build an entire IDE out of VBA macros, or for that matter you could build an entire word processor out of macros in an IDE.
How I would love to see Word die. They had their one chance and muffed it. Even with things equivalent to include and it appears that your tool allows the SGML to do that behavior in Word docs, which is interesting in concept you still have to be able to have an unambiguous canonical parse. One can attempt to separate out sections into independently managed subsections, true. But the popular definition essay writer sites sf of global styles and settings makes doing that fraught with danger.
This is about the least harmful variation on this theme, there are far more dangerous things which can happen in the data One can establish groupware which publishes global updates for globally affecting parameters, etc.
This is not insolvable. Back in the days of the Mac Classic and the dot matrix printer we had, to a first approximation, all the word processing features that were absolutely indispensible - memory, bold, italic -- enough, say, to satisfy Dickens.
That had the effect of leveling off quite a bit of the imbalance between the powers of governments and companies on the one hand and the person in the street on the other.
The particular flaw in Word that has my attention at the moment is their spellcheck, which is rudimentary to the point of imbecility. Five simple extra commands would halve the error rate. Many scientists will use it and it is infuriating. Word is not for science I still use the pre ribbon version mostly - the ribbon version is on my travel computer, and popular definition essay writer sites sf can go creative writing ghostwriter services online itself.
Mostly scripts there days, but copy, articles, and prose over the years. Whereas no one has ever presented me with a function in Scrivner useful enough to learn how to use it. I also suspect popular definition essay writer sites sf works fine for what most users need. Xwem is merely the commonest; there popular definition essay writer sites sf even fuglier ones out there: SXemacsfor example.
Screen popular definition essay writer sites sf that only an emacs-head could love. Instead, they tell the pointy heads in charge of large organisations that Wurd is an all-singing, all-dancing miracle product that can perform any conceivable task. Furthermore, they convince the pointy heads that the progam is so miraculous that their workers can use it with more info training whatsoever, since it has so many "smart" and "auto" features.
Hint to any non-expert readers: turn off anything labelled "smart" or "auto". The result is the calamity that I witness studies services proofreading religious in my industry. Procedures have to reviewed every 3 years, every year for critical procedures. If the standard of documentation were equally bad in the aircraft industry, the skies would be empty because the FAA would never grant a licence to any product with such abysmal documentation.
When I worked at a major company in the Middle East, I was based in the training centre for plant operating personnel. A popular definition essay writer sites sf of times a week, we had visitors from the capital city, who delivered training courses to the admin staff in using MS Office. The training company claimed to be one of the largest in the world and produced nice, spiral-bound training books for the students. Out of curiosity, I took a look at the Wurd book.
Out of pages, two pages yes, 2 were given over to styles. All the rest explained how to perform manual formatting. When I looked at the back of the book, I discovered why. It had a series of sample questions for the students to pass the "Microsoft Certified TextMangler" exam. Obviously, this exam requires answers that explain manual formatting techniques, and these students were being coached to pass the exam, not coached how to use the program correctly. And who could blame either the coaches or the students?
A pox on Microsoft and its miserable practices. Autocorrect can be useful, but only after several hours of nailing it down deleting standard entries and adding ones that you actually make. Even "correct 2 inital capitals" might be useful, if someone had thought to check whether the text it was working on actually went ".
However, in most cases a grammar checker just tells me my grammar fails, but the suggestion does not work either. Then I try to restructure the sentences in an another way. My 7-year old does think that the pretty green wiggly lines under some sentences are nice. Otherwise, no, not really. Sorry Greg, was feeling a little sleep deprived and flippant, and you made me laugh a couple of times -- I am more with you than my comment might indicate.
I am also sadly embedded deep inside a major corporation, and therefore have WORD and other MS tools inflicted on me daily basis without any real hope of respite.
This is probably why the MS OFFICE suite is unlikely to die anytime soon -- it is so deeply entrenched within copmanies large and small, removing it completely is not a short-term, easy, or cheap goal; and this is regardless of how truly abyssmally poorly WORD and its cohorts are used within most corporations.
SOME people - please note SOME - with dyslexia can find it useful. I write RPG books, usually containing a lot of sections which need to be organised for maximum clarity and will often be printed out. Yes, I could put the popular definition essay writer sites sf stuff at the bottom of the page or something, but it usually looks horrible and interrupts the flow of the main "narrative" for want of a better word.
Like it or not, unless you are going entirely over to a hypertext model, which pretty much rules out printing the document, columns are still one of the better popular definition essay writer sites sf to do this sort of thing, you just need to be prepared to print out pages or use a larger screen.
It flags 2 spaces between words within a sentence but not between sentences. The blue squiggly underlines are the ones that I would like to make compulsory for users. Wurd has a setting "Keep Track of Formatting" popular definition essay writer sites sf applies squiggly blue underlines to text that has been manually formatted.
Some of the manuals that pass my desk popular definition essay writer sites sf squiggly blue underlines on just about every para in the doc. Painful on the eyes.
I agree with andrewhickey. You will start producing much higher quality documents. I have been using it for 15 or more years; wrote a PhD thesis with it, numerous articles, notes, summaries, posters. It works well with BibTeX also, which is a great way to produce bibliographies and maintain archives of references. It keeps getting better as well. After popular definition essay writer sites sf the document you have a parsed personal ghostwriting services sf. Today, these parsed trees are thrown away on each parse.
Instead of throwing the parsed tree away, merely do a fix-up on the existing tree. With such a system you never parse an entire document. Only one element at a time. Now imagine that the parsed tree were available to all participants.
Changes to the document would be cooperative instead of collaborative as is the case popular definition essay writer sites sf. Click at this page is not an issue since all style ie, presentation is subordinate to the semantic tree.
I applaud you learning ghostwriter services best custom united essay states. There are very few people who take the time to learn to use their software tools like you have. In your hands Word is a beautiful tool. One of the ways to do this organisation is by using sidebars, which let you insert small self-contained passages that add flavour to the main text one way or another iBooks has a way of handling that.
Books in landscape orientation popular definition essay writer sites sf displayed like PDF documents: as they were laid out. Flip the iPad to portrait and they display like epub documents, with text flowing and user-resizable. Figures and the like display as thumbnails, which you can tap to expand, then collapse again. Of course, iBooks is a Mac-only format.
We need something in the epub or other open format that says, essentially, tap to display in a window. I last tried LyX in early Not a hell of a lot of use for anything other than LaTeX -- papers and theses -- and poor at interoperativity with the rest of the world. Yes, LyX is mostly LaTeX.
Interoperability is fine for LaTeX docs and you can import most text sources with helpers like antiword. Although I knew LaTeX before I learned a lot by exporting LyX documents to. A few years ago I went looking for some kind of word processor geared for writers, but I did not find anything worth the learning I would have had to invest in order to make it work for me.
Some of them were far too complicated taking the notion of getting in-between users and their work to a far greater degree than was supportable, for me. Actually, I can give you a recommendation. And the last place to look is the MS "help" system, which is worse than useless. The first popular definition essay writer sites sf to overcome is configuring the snake pit of a program sensibly, since MS have set the default options to be unscary to users who are barely able to operate a keyboard.
On source I have done over the last several years, I have made locked-styles templates to prevent users doing any manual formatting, and part of the job was popular definition essay writer sites sf to write a configuration guide to tell users how to set up their user options so that the program would work without causing problems.
The guide ended up a couple of dozen pages - before even using the program. OK, a lot of it was screenshots. Is it any wonder that average users get confused and into a mess? For popular definition essay writer sites sf documents, you need only a few styles.
I have never, and I mean never, known it to go wrong. Now I see the emergence of collaborative editing environments like Draft and Editorially most are based on Markdownand wonder if the era of Github for Writers is finally arriving.
Version control, document portability, One True Version of the document I know from grim personal experience the horrors of multiple versions of the truthmultiple layers of comments, etc These are good things.
The MS graveyard is bursting with corpses of formerly popular definition essay writer sites sf features. I hope LaTeX would be used more prominently, particularly by scientists. It is not ideal, but it has evolved well and hopefully will continue into more improved condition over time. Got an old latex document from the s? Okay; try viewing it today. Missing a library file? Compile your latex document. Figure out which component it is.
Read its documentation to find out how to specify backwards-compatible mode. Add a line to your popular definition essay writer sites sf specifying backwards compatibility. Spend an entire day reading documentation online to figure out you need to install Cygwin and then install ghostscript and then install ghostview. Try to view your DVI file. Find the fonts on some Russian website that probably has malware. Download and install them. Maybe you will finally get to see your file.
Displaying a document from the s with Microsoft Word is much easier than with files any other word processor or document processor. Only popular definition essay writer sites sf HTML is easier to display. HINT: The primary enemy was Napoleon Buonaparte That being said, you can open Word 5. The easiest word processor I ever used was Writing Assistant. Probably the most useful was WordPerfect 5. The only slow thing about it was waiting for it to compile the index and ToC. Just click for source only hard part was laying out tables.
That is a whole lot easier with Open Office Writer under Windows. I do hate Word though, particularly as it gets used in most organisations.
I recently had the opportunity to learn more here with a former writer popular definition essay writer sites sf a prestigious essay writing service and his experience in the industry. When I became part of the team for Rush EssayI thought we would be writing academic content for students with below-average capacity.
Popular definition essay writer sites sf was in for a surprise. We got orders from all types of students - lazy ones who only want continue reading find an easier way out of a messy situation, as well as really smart young people who simply couldn't find the time to do their own work.
I was convinced that students who got into Harvard, Berkeley, Oxford, Cambridge, and other prestigious US and UK universities would work much harder than the ones admitted to "secondary" schools. In fact, they do work hard; and click is the exact reason why they cannot afford to fail. In some cases, the assignment's requirements are so complex that it's difficult for the students to understand what the real question is.
The struggles of ESL students are even greater; it is nearly impossible for them to produce degree-level academic content. Since the charges for plagiarism are serious, they have to rely on essay writing services as a solution that provides unique content by the given deadline.
California, New York and Texas are the most popular regions where orders were coming from. Stanford, UCLA, Berkeley, NYU, Columbia, University of Houston, and other institutions from these states are known for their competitive systems. A student who hopes to graduate from one of these universities usually needs to rely on "unorthodox" methods to deal with all challenges popular definition essay writer sites sf by the professors. Since academic writing is becoming one of the most prominent aspects of the educational system, the constant development of the custom-writing industry is clearly justified.
The most popular types of content requested from custom-writing services are essays, research papers, and MA thesis. Students have an abundance of essays and research papers to write, so there is nothing unusual in the fact that professional writers mostly deal with these types of assignments. When it comes to subjects, students most commonly popular definition essay writer sites sf with projects for Business, English language, and Management courses.
According to those within the industry, buying papers is a necessary reaction to serious underlying issues in the educational system.
All college and university professors will tell you this web page same thing: to them, the act of purchasing papers online is no different than plagiarism. However, some argue that the issue is more complex than that claiming, that the content completed by professional writers is not plagiarized.
It is completely unique, well-researched and properly-referenced. When a customer buys this type of product, he has the right to use it as a source for another popular definition essay writer sites sf, or simply submit it as his own.
The teacher may suspect that the student didn't write a particular paper, but there popular definition essay writer sites sf no way to prove such claims. Higher education is an industry on its own. Universities accept more applicants, including international students who don't have the needed grasp of the English language to write extraordinary academic content. On the other hand, they don't provide effective support that would enable these students to fit into the system.
The benefits of using custom-writing services are immense for foreign students. In addition, students with part-time jobs, older students who have families and those who are going through tough personal struggles simply need help to go through all challenges they face. The rapid growth of the custom-writing industry is a symptom of the great weaknesses within the educational system, which put students through a great deal of stress and emotional struggle.
We all know the definition of cheating is, and simply saying that the work is more challenging for most or that they may not receive enough support from educators, or have enough time to dedicate popular definition essay writer sites sf the work does not change the read more of cheating, or make it right in any way. Speaking from both ends of popular definition essay writer sites sf argument, there are those that feel as if these services are creating lazy students popular definition essay writer sites sf helping to learn more here an unprepared workforce.
Writing is a vital skill that is applied in many areas of life, especially for those who are entering the workforce, whether they are doing so as an employee or a business owner. With communications being a vital skill for anyone entering the workforce, our education system recognizes this and strives to prepare our professional university dissertation methodology topics by requiring them to improve this skill through writing assignments.
By outsourcing the work, students, are depriving themselves of the opportunity to strengthen their communications and writing skills. School bibliography ideas annotated popular professors and popular definition essay writer sites sf that difficult to reach that so many prefer to risk the stiff penalties of being caught cheating, rather than asking for help?
There are many other options available for international, and any other student that may be struggling to keep up, from study groups, to programs within schools and Universities, such as writing centers.
What they do require, however, is that the student actually make an effort, read article simply making the decision to apply themselves. Start your workday the right way with the news that matters most. The Shocking Truth About Essay Read article Services. Why Do Students Feel As If They Need Them?
Some statistics - Who buys papers online? The essay writing industry is a source of interesting statistical data. What About The Moral Argument? Follow Nancy Laws on Twitter:. Founder of SheMeets Redefining Networking for Women in Business and Content Creator.
Essay Writing Education Higher Education Outsourcing.
Adresa: Strada Lirei nr. 10, sector 2
Cod postal 021422
Tel: +4021 252 56 20
Fax: +4021 252 90 00
We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.